Bing Hodneland logo



List Bestselling Books


List Bestselling DVDs


Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale
In Association with

All the information on this site is free. But if it is of value to you, I appreciate a tip.

Previous page:

Notes on "Hold Me Tight"

Next page:
Previous page: Covers on "With The Beatles" Next page: Notes on "Not A Second Time"

This article is from Alan W. Pollack's groundbreaking series "Notes on the Beatles". Links in the orginal article is written in this colour: index to the series, while links I have added appears as standard links. Go here for more information on my site about the song

Notes on "Hold Me Tight"

KEY F Major


FORM Intro -> Verse -> Verse -> Bridge -> Verse -> Bridge -> Verse -> Outro (complete ending)

General Points Of Interest

Style and Form

This one's a good example of the standard two-bridge-but-no-solo formal model, and it's in the unusual key choice for the Beatles of F Major. And that's where the easy parts of it end. Granted, it has some mixed reputation among even the serious fans, and none other than Paul Himself has been known to vaguely shrug it off as just a "work song." But, no matter, there is no escaping its technical sophistication. Consider the following three items for starters, and keep in mind we're not even getting anywhere near the finer details yet:

  1. Chromatic "line cliches" are hidden throughout the song within the inner voices of the chord changes, sewn between the layers of fabric, as it were, to an extent that the device provides structure and unification, not just decoration.

  2. The rhythm track features the similarly widespread use of an ostinato figure in the bass and guitar parts; i.e., the same arpeggiated riff transposed and repeated for many of the chord changes.

  3. In between the end of the second verse and the beginning of the bridge there is a simultaneously melodic, verbal, and metric elision in which the measure containing word "you" serves as a pivot.

I don't know if it's just a side-effect of the growing number of songs in the Beatles canon we've already covered in this series, or if "Hold Me Tight" *really is* that stylistically resonant, but I am struck by the extent to which it free-associates with other Lennon/McCartney songs. We observed widespread use of chromatic line cliches in "You Won't See Me" (Note #9), phrasing elisions in "It Won't Be Long" and "Any Time At All", and an ostinato bassline in "Day Tripper" and (eventually will when we get up to) "Lady Madonna." However, I believe that the most important resonance for "Hold Me Tight" is in its affinity with the emotional push-pull of "Please Please Me". Even though "Hold Me Tight" does not contain the same level of expository high drama as the latter song, it does seem to describe a similar tableau of hot pursuit at the brink.


The song is unrelievedly in the key of F Major. Though only seven different chords are used throughout, three of them (almost half the budget) are altered, or borrowed ones, not occurring naturally in the home key. In order of appearance these are V-of-V (G), minor iv (B flat minor), and flat III (A flat). By now we've become quite used to seeing examples of the first two of these chords in Beatles songs.

But the last one, "flat III", is a bit more rare and dramatic in sound. In theoretical terms, it's actually not quite as remote a neighbor to the home key as may appear at first glance. The textbooks describe it as the relative Major to the parallel minor -- imagine the home key being f minor instead of F Major and you'll see what I mean. In context of the Beatles, we've seen this one used before in the bridge section of "You're Going To Lose That Girl" and as part of a little chord stream in the verse section of PPM. In any event, the special dramatic flavor of this chord is manifested in the way that, when juxtaposed with the I chord, we hear an implied melodic wavering between the Major/minor third degree of the scale; in our song which is in F Major, we're talking about the notes A flat and A natural.


The arrangement has an overall thick sound with husky sounding guitars, lots of cymbal sizzle, and hand claps.

Paul gets to sing the lead vocal solo, while John and George provide a backing part that features a tricky passage of syncopated antiphony with the lead in the third phrase of the verses. The same sloppiness of execution which brought take 22 of the song to a rapid halt may also be heard on the finished track for an instant during the third verse.

The backing vocals sound discordant to the extent that they are placed very close to each other pitch-wise, and for John especially, are high up in the voice range. This is actually a widespread trademark device of the group and perhaps the reason why some react to it *here* with less than their usual enthusiasm is because the combination of John with George in this context is just not as euphonious as it is with Paul.

And of course, there is the infamously repeated verbal collision every time the phrase "it feels so right so/now" appears. Though there are several other such mistakes littered throughout the official recordings, I tend to think of this as being not so much an error as what I can only surmise was an intentional albeit misguided experiment.

Section-By-Section Walkthrough


The intro is only two measures long yet it manages to quickly establish the key, expose the ostinato guitar figure, and introduce what emerges over the course of the song as one of its hooks, the phrase "it feels so right."

The whole thing sounds deceptively similar to the way the end of the bridge sections lead back around into the verses which follow them. However, a variation in the rhythmic emphasis of the backing track here makes for a subtle difference.


The verse is sixteen measures long and divides up into three phrases. The first two are a couplet of four measures each, and the last eight measures combine to make one long phrase which nicely balances out the previous two:

    |---------------------- 2X ----------------------|

line cliche: A   B flat     B natural C
     chords:|F          |B flat    |G          |C          |
          F: I           IV         V-of-V      V

line cliche: F   E flat     D           D flat
     chords:|F          |F7        |B flat     |b flat minor|
          F: I           V-of-IV    IV          iv

     chords:|F          |b flat min.|F          |C          |
          F: I           IV          I           V

This section has a strongly dramatic arch-like feeling to it in the way it begins to intensify during the third phrase toward a clear climax on the downbeat of the thirteenth measure (on the phrase "it's *YOU*").

The setup of the climax is musically abetted by a number of factors. The first four measures of the long third phrase are rhetorically insistent in the way they repeat the same two melodic notes several times ("so hold me tight, tonight ..."). This is further supported by the way in which the *root* harmonic rhythm suddenly slows from a change every measure to every other measure and the syncopated antiphony of the backing vocal. The big moment itself is enhanced by the appearance of the long-awaited melodic high note on the downbeat of measure 13, and the sudden cessation of the agitated syncopation of the previous measures.

Even the sequencing of upward versus downward line cliches plays a dramatic role. One might say, in the same oversimplified language that allows us to describe the Major mode as "happy" and the minor as "sad", that upward line cliches connote such things as eager expectation, while the downward ones connote grimness or impatience. In that sense, the use of the upward gesture in the first two phrases, followed by the downward one at the beginning of the third phrase helps portray a dramatic development which has quite a bit of real-world experiential resonance to it. The cheerful coaxing of the first half of this verse might be said to give way to something a bit more desperate before it's over. I even hear this tension reinforced by the way the minor iv chord is inserted so quickly after what would otherwise be a moment of release following the climax; try that phrase with the more "natural" Major IV and see how different it feels.

Verse Variations

All the verses other than the first one contain an A flat chord (flat III) in their last measure; all the smoother to lead toward the bridge and outro sections.

Yet another small example of foolish consistency avoided can be found in the way Paul throws in a little vocal flip and stretches out the scanning of the words in the first phrase of the third verse.


This bridge is an unusual seven measures in length and its subphrases are not easily or neatly to be parsed. There is even some ambiguous possibility, created by the elision mentioned above, that this section is to be "heard" as eight measures long if you include the last elided measure of the verse as part of the bridge.

line cliche: A        A flat   A         B flat    -      B nat.   C
     chords:|F       |A flat  |F        |B flat   |g minor  |G Major |C
          F: I       flat III  I  IV    ii      V-of-V   V

As a variation on the straight up-or-down line cliches of the verse, we have in this section a more snake-like inner line which lends an air of suspenseful indecision to the music. The slowing of the root harmonic rhythm toward the end reinforces that sense of suspense. Note though how this mood is shaken off by section's ending with another climax, this time assisted by an *upward* line cliche.

Other more typical sources of bridge-like contrast here are the change in texture (drumming without cymbals and slowly-strummed guitar chords on the downbeats -- see "I Should Have Known Better"), and the backing voices being given a rest.


The outro is done as fake pass at a third repetition of the bridge that literally grinds to a stop, with the ritardando starting a full three measures before the end. Given the sort of emotional program of pursuit sketched out earlier, this sort of musical ending doesn't bode well for the fate of our hero.

Some Final Thoughts

In context of the rest of the Beatles' early output, this is clearly one of their hotter "touch" songs; more urgent than the sweetly pleading "I Want To Hold Your Hand" but also less confrontational than "Please, Please Me".

Ironically though, "Hold Me Tight" also reminds one at the same time of the more innocent precursor songs of pursuit by other artists. In particular, I hear echoes in it of Carl Perkins' "Sure To Fall" which includes the line, "so hold me tight, let tonight be the night, darling, don't ever let me go."

In the final result, as we saw earlier in the case of "All My Loving" versus "It Won't Be Long", whatever parallels may be found between "Hold Me Tight" and "Please, Please Me" also serve to underscore some of the primal differences in style between Paul and John. Just as in "All My Loving", the focus for Paul in "Hold Me Tight" is temporally on the present and future of the relationship to the love object (no past!), and is emotionally self-centered with no allowance for or representation of *her* feelings and actions. John, in contrast, always includes both allusions to the past and *her* actions, even resorting as necessary to some clever measures to work this into the lyrical narrative no matter how obliquely.

There's also a much simpler logistical difference between the respective endings of PPM and "Hold Me Tight". Whereas the former would seem to end with the gauntlet thrown down and the situation beyond the point of return, the latter would seem to leave us with the poor hero "on my knees, beggin' if you please." But, oops, that's a different song altogether, isn't it ?

Alan (

"Aye, but don't rush. None of your five bar gate jumps and over sort of stuff." 112091#39

Copyright (c) 1991 by Alan W. Pollack

All Rights Reserved

This article may be reproduced, retransmitted, redistributed and otherwise propagated at will, provided that this notice remains intact and in place.

These articles were originally posted in the News Group The content from this newsgroup is archived at, and Alan W. Pollacks "Notes On" series can be found at

. I used to link to the versions published in Soundscapes before I decided to include them on my own site.

If you want to learn more about the musical side of song writing, chord progressions, harmony and theory through The Beatles songs (and/or The Beatles in particular), I recommend the following book:

Artist: Dominic Pedler

Arranged by The Beatles

More >>

The Songwriting Secrets of the Beatles

Book of the Month 2003-10
The Songwriting Secrets Of The Beatles is an essential addition to Beatles literature - a new and perceptive analysis of both the music and the lyrics.

More than thirty years after The Beatles split up, the music of Lennon, McCartney and Harrison lives on. What exactly were the magical ingredients of those legendary songs? why are they still so influential for today's bands? This groundbreaking book sets out to exlore The Beatles' songwriting techniques in a clear and readable style. It is aimed not only at musicians but anyone who has ever enjoyed the work of one of the most productive and successful songwriting partnerships of the 20th century. Author Dominic Pedler explains the chord sequences, melodies and harmonies that made up The Beatles' self penned songs and how they uncannily complemented the lyrical themes. He also assesses the contributions that rhythm, form and arrangement made to the Beatles unique sound. Throughout the book the printed music of the Beatles' songs appears alongside the text, illustrating the authors explanations. The Songwriting Secrets of The Beatles is an essential addition to Beatles literature - a new and perceptive analysis of the music itself itself as performed by what Paul McCartney still calls 'a really good, tight little band'.

Level: , 816 pages
RefNr: 0711981671
Order From:
Amazon UK
Amazon US
Previous page: Previous page: Covers on "With The Beatles"Next page: Notes on "Not A Second Time" Next page:

Previous page: Next page:
Previous page: Covers on "With The Beatles" Next page: Notes on "Not A Second Time"